reflects a cultural or a chronological difference, or is simply a consequence of the small number of finds.
The stratigraphy suggests a date in the Lateglacial period, and this is supported by the flint technique employed, the tool types, their morphology and the dorsally-worked blade point present in the assemblage.
In addition to an apparent chronological difference between the two sites, there are also many structural differences, with Bro I having a circular, slightly sunken feature, numerous finds and a distribution of artefacts in characteristic “activity areas” around a centrally-positioned hearth.
There is also a difference in the number of tools and in the form and extent of the finds distribution.
Only scattered Lateglacial finds have been recorded from the central part of eastern Jutland to date (fig. These probably do not provide a true picture of the settlement of the time, but reflect chance situations. In addition to their content of flint, the fill in the pits also differed from the surrounding sand layer in that it was more brownish-grey in colour. Three dihedral burins have been produced with two blows, and one example is a combination of a retouched edge and a blow (fig. Two combinations of angle and dihedral burins are of a type that has not previously been described from a Danish Lateglacial site (fig. Twenty burin spalls show that burins have been heavily used; two of these spalls could be refitted with a burin (fig. Similar pieces are known from Federmesser settlements. 17a-b) (three examples) are unusual types at Danish Lateglacial sites. Hammer- or crushing stones of stratified porphyry with crush marks at one end are represented by a single example (fig. The flint-working at Søvind is characterised by hard, direct technique, and the cores are conical or cylindrical with a smooth platform.The shape of the bell-turret is an indication that the village once belonged to the Republic of Genoa.The small medieval village is famous for its beauty and charm.This showed that it took only 2.5 hours of flint-working to “manufacture” the entire assemblage (fig. This supports the idea of a very brief occupation, but it should not be understood as meaning that Søvind represents precisely 2.5 hours of flint-working and occupation.If Søvind is compared with the Bromme culture site of Bro I (Andersen 1972), where the remains suggested brief (seasonal) occupation by a single, small social unit, Søvind’s special character becomes clearly apparent.
Dating sites danmark Horsens
Umiddelbart efter isætning af båden, skal bil og trailer placeres uden for slæbestedsområdet.Større både henvises til Juelsminde eller Hov Der er i havneområdet installeret trådløst internet.Perhaps the tools were brought to Søvind, where they were used and then discarded.In order to gain an impression of how long people stayed at the site, an experimental reproduction of the Søvind flint was undertaken.It is small both with respect to area and the amount of worked flint; the composition of the tool inventory is also narrow, being dominated by burins and scrapers.